-Endnotes -

1.    "the cauldron from which wars often spring"        h  Charles W Kegley Jr  Eugene R Wittkopf World Politics Treand and Transformation Fifth ed New york: St Martin's Press 1995 pp 445-446 457-459

2.     Liah Greenferld Nationalism Five Roads to Modernity Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press 1992 p 3

3.    "both ideology and patriotism as concepts suffer from an overload of polemics and the difficulty of precies meaning The attack on ultranationalism has produced considerable uneasiness about patriotism" - Morris Janowitz The Reconstruction of Patriotism: Education of Civic Consciousness Chicago & London: The University of Chikago Press 1985 pp 8-9

4.    there is not nationalusm but many, Anatoly m. Khazanov, After the USSR: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Politics in the Commonwealth of Independent States (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1995), p. XV.

5.    1. It feels good to belong to a larger entity; being part of an ongoing group provides a kind of immortality To belong to one which does not have pride in itself is hurtful to an individual's self-esteem. 2. Ethno-cultural diversity is fun. The word's largest industry is the tourist business; people like to travel and seehow others live; we spend a lot of money to get a rtaste of exotic others. 3. Ethnic diversity has survival value for the human species. Ethno-cultures provide solutions to problems 4. Often, ethno/nationalism has a progressive quality in so far it provides a basis for popular participation in governance. The flourishing of nationalism in the last century was part of the process of fundamental democratization of modern times. It proclaimed the right of the masses to claim autonomy in many cultural and social as well as political areas of life. Ethnic solidarity is also one source for the maintenace of a civil society 5. Ethnicity is one possible coordination point, a basis for organizing amd mobilizing. Having some identity as a base for organization is inevitable. Ethnicity, even nationalism, has advantages over some other bases of organizing. For example, compare them to universalist ones: political ideologies and religions are often messianic and proselytizing, while nationalism has self-limits. One implication of these observations is that we should not work for the elimination of ethnic identity or even nationalism we are to understand how to foster the desired aspects of ethno/nationalism and reduce the negative aspects. - - the 1990s, The Peace Studies Bulletin, Vol. 2, Numbers 1-2, Winter 1992-1993, pp. 25-26.

6.      , , Adrian hastings. The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997); Michael Lind, In defense of liberal nationalism, Foreign Affairs (May June 1994), pp. 87-99.

7.    ee Walker Connor Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding New Jersey: Prinston University Press 1996 p 4 paperback page; cf Ernest Barker National Character and the Facrors in Its formation London 1927 p 173

8.    Liah Greenfeld Nationalism p14 cf p 6          -                       p 495 note 9

9.    Walker Connor, Ethnonationalism, op. cit., p. 95, note.

10.    See K. J. Holtsi, International Politics: A framework for Analysis (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1995), p. 58.

11.                :                 4-5-     2000:

12.                                1997

13.    , , Adrian Hastings. The Construction of nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge: cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 19-22, 31, 77, 108, 148, 151-152; Cheine Anwar. The Arabic Language: Its Role in History (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1969); Yu. V. Bromley. Ocherki teorii etnosa (Moskva: Nauka, 1983), . 110-117, 241-243, 327-332; S. A. Arutunian. Etnicheskie processy i yazyk, -- Rasy i narody (Ezhegodnik) No.15 (1985), Moskva: Nauka, 1986, . 30-65.

14.    , , G. A. Kapantsyan. Khayasa  kolybel` armyan. Etnogenez armyan i ikh nachal`naya istoriya (Yerevan, Izd. AN Arm SSR), 1947. . . .   .   (, 1987).     , O sootnoshenii hajasskogo i armyanskogo yazykov,           - , 1986, No 1, 2, 1992, No. 1,          - , 2000, No. 1: Thomas Samuelian, Armenian Originis: An Overview of Ancient and Modern Sources and Theories (Yerevan: Iravunk Publishing House) 2000.

15.    Thomas Samielian, Armenian Origins, op. cit., pp. 7-11; Istoriya Armenii s drevnejshikh vremen do nashikh dney. Pod redakciey E. L. Danielyana. (Yerevan: Ankyunakar, 1999), . 7-8.      ,        ... 7-6-  ( The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Fifteenth ed., 1984, Macropedia, Vol. 2, p. 23):

16.        : . 1.  . . , . . : ,   ., 1981,  196: Strabo, Geographi. Compiled and transl. by F. Lasserre (Paris, 1975), book XI, Chapters 14, 5 (Coll. G. Bude, vol. VIII, p. 123).       ,   .    .   [Identias], , , , 1995,  91-93:

17.           

18.                -       " " 1997          7-    -           -            VII-VI :   1998  59-90

19.                :       1991  1913     46

20.                                        -           1933      115

21.                43                           -              1998  200-201                                            [  ]  h    :

22.            231 20

23.         .       1968  43 158 267

24.                                  -    267

25.     Liah Greenfeld, Nationalism. Five Roads to Modernity, pp. 368, 549 (n. 179)      Deutche Vaterlanslieder (Leipzig: Insel Verlag, 193[?]), Insel-Bucherei 154, p. 28:

26.            1992  249         1995  15

27.       :        1972  6 73               1987  149

28.                    13-           :                 

29.               1972  93                                        19-                              -              1989  125

30.         84

31.       132

32.       133

33.          6 168 170

34.             -  1862  12             1861  19

35.               1985  63

36.              1860  29  Khronograficheskaya istoriya, sostavlennaq otsom Mekhitarom, vardapetom Ayrivanskim. Perevod s armyanskogo s predislowiem i primechaniyami K. Patkanova. S. Peterburg, 1869, . 268, 371-372.

37.              V-XV     1954  264

38.          211-213         287

39.         1729  297-299

40.       297:                                                 73-74 76

41.     :

42.       299

43.           1941  22   42 48

44.           1784 153-164

45.       153 32

46.       156

47.      Liah Greenfeld Nationalism opcitpp 69-70 78   97-99   243-245 247   368-369  

48.                        the Dutch         :

49.    Liah Greenfeld Nationalism op cit pp 69-70 78

50.       98

51.     :         "The sweet French tongue is the most beautiful gracious and noble language in the world the best accepted and loved For God made it so sweet and lovable for his glory and praise that it can be compared to the language spoken by the angels in heaven"

52.       98-99

53.    Liah Greenfeld Nationalism op cit pp 98 368

54.    Bol`shaya sovetskaya enciklopediya. Tom 22, Moskva, 1975, . 410.

55.        10  1984  90-91

56.    Liah GreenfeldNationalism op cit pp 243-245 247

57.       243

58.     ,  245:

59.    M.V. Lomonosov, Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Tom 2. Istoriya, filologiya (Moskva: Nauka, 1986), s. 195:

60.    Liah Greenfeld, Nationalism, op. cit., p. 533, note 105. Cf. Hans Rogger, National Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960), p. 103:

61.          245

62.    "Civilization is the process of becoming linking the thought of the past to the present Thus all present thought implicitly continues and criticisez the thought of the past" - David Miller ed The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought Oxford-Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers 1995 p 85

63.    Mekhanizm nasledovaniya kul`tury- eto mekhanizm preemstvennosti: funkcionirovaniya kul`turnoj traditsii,vossozdaniya i obnovleniya kul`turoy samoj sebya. ... Kul`tura sozidaetsya cherez sozidanie kul`tury: v etoy , s vidu tavtologicheskoy formule soderzhitsya istina.  G. A. Gevorkian. Natsional`naya kul`tura s tochki zreniya filosofii istorii (Yerevan, Izd. AN Armenii, 1992), s. 24, 25.

64.                                                       -          23    30-31          

